R.Muralidharan Advocate & Patent Attorney
56/1, 4th Main, 18th
Cross, Malleshwaram,
Bangalore – 560055 Phone :
+91-(080) 3346166 Telefax:
+91-(080) 3314404 e-mail: mailto:%20manumurali@eth.net
mailto:%20manumurali%20@justice.com
Preparation of Patent
Application :
| I. |
Application has to be made in the following
Forms:
1. FORM 1-APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF PATENT-in
triplicate Relevant
Sections:-Sec.5(2),Sec.7,Sec.54,Sec.135(If priority is claimed),Rule
33A of Patent Rules,1972
2. FORM 2-PROVISIONAL/COMPLETE SPECIFICATION-in
triplicate Relevant
Section:-Sec.10
3. FORM 3-STATEMENT & UNDERTAKING OF CORRESPONDING
FOREIGN PATENT APPLICATIONS-in
duplicate Relevant
Sections-Sec.8& Rule 13
|
| II. |
Checklist
1. While preparing the application, expanded
full names must be used in the applications. For example, R.Murali
should be shown as Raghavachari Murali.
2. Nationality of the applicant is essential
& it must always follow the expanded name of the
applicant.
3. The Legal personality of the Applicant is
also crucial. While natural persons, like individuals, pay an
official fee of Rs.1500/- per application, incorporated artificial
persons have to pay an official fee of
Rs.5000/-.
4. If the applicant is an Indian
national-desirous of applying for foreign patents also, you can
advise the patent cooperation route.
5. The official fee payable for a PCT
application is Rs.45,000/- in the beginning & additional sums
payable at the time of search &
registration.
6. The applicant must also be appraised of the
existence of the National Research Development Corporation,New
Delhi(NRDC).This provides some kind of financial assistance for
desiring applicants on mutuallty agreed terms &
conditions. |
| III. |
TITLE OF THE
INVENTION-ABSTRACT
1. While the applicant would prefer a generic
term to broadly describe the invention ,Indian Patent Office
requires that the title should have some bearing on the main claim.
Therefore it is safer to show a title which will have some
connection with the main claim.
2. Strictly speaking, the title is just a
technical identification tag for the application which, along with
the Abstract of the invention enables the Patent Office to make
appropriate classification for the purpose of referringot the
examiner’s report.
3. The Abstract of the invention is not always
needed at the time of filing the patent application. However, the
Patent Office may insist on an Abstract of the invention, which the
Patent Office itself will prepare based on the main claim,in
case the applicant does not provide one on his
own.
4. Submission of the Abstract of the invention
would enable the Patent Office to do a quicker reference seeking the
Examiner’s report. |
| IV. |
DRAWINGS:
1. The right hand top of the drawings sheet
should bear the title of the invention along with the number
assigned to it by the Patent Office.
2. The left hand side should indicate the
total number of drawing sheets & the order of the present
drawing sheet.
3. Drawings must be in triplicate & at least
one of them must be done on transparent plastic or polyester
films & drawn in indelible ink.
4. The right hand bottom corner of the
drawing sheet ,should indicate clearly the name of the applicant,
the name of the natural persons signing it ,in case he is an
artificial person signing it, & the authority, if any, of the
signatory to represent the applicant.
5. Drawings should not contain any kind of
descriptive matter.
6. The parts of the invention shown in the
drawing must be shown in continuous serial numbers & the parts
must be elaborately described in detail in the body of the
specification.
7. In the case of organic chemical patents, the
body of the specification cannot contain the chemical structure
& the bonding of the atoms in the molecules. They must be
appropriately shown in the drawing sheet.
|
| V. |
SCRUTINY OF THE DRAFT OF
SPECIFICATIONS
1. At the outset, it has to be conceded that
drafting a specification involves more technical than legal
skill.
2. However, drafting of a claim involves
specific legal skills as it is the claim which determines the scope
of the monopoly.
3. The claims will have to be justified in the
light of the disclosure in the
specification.
4. The first page of the specification,whether
provisional or complete , will be as in Form
2.
5. The descriptive matter of the specification
will have to begin from the second page & the specification can
only be typed on one side of the paper with appropriate margins
& spaces as stipulated in the rules.
6. As pointed out earlier, a typical complete
specification has the following parts:
| a) Area-background of the
invention
b) Status of the prior
art
c) Problems with the prior
art
d) How this invention seeks to solve the
problems
e) What features achieve this problem
solving
f) How the present invention constitutes an
improvement over what is already
known
g) Statement of
Invention
h) Explanation to the accompanying
drawings.
i) Claims-Main,dependant,& omnibus
claims |
7. A wise Patent attorney would ask for the
written inputs from the inventor-applicant on points (a) to (h)
above & prepare (i) sitting with the
client.
8. A Complete Specification should not have any
abbreviations, trademarks or domain names that belong to others,
including the applicant. It is better to describe products by their
generic names.
9. In India, the patent attorneys have not been
specializing as the American attorneys do. An average Indian
patent attorney finds himself/herself handling
organic/inorganic/physical/bio-technical/ electrical engineering
patents etc. over a period of time.
10. The statement of invention mentioned above is
nothing but the condensed main claim & it must find a place in
the specification ,Just prior to the drawings
reference. |
|
FORM 3
STATEMENT & UNDERTAKING REGARDING THE FOREIGN PATENT
FILING OF THE CORRESPONDING INVENTION
1. Advise the client that as & when a patent
application is made abroad for the same invention, within 3 months
of the said application,they must inform the patent office in
writing in Form 3.
2. Failure to do so may result in revocation of the
patent , unless condoned under Rules 124 &
125.
3. In case the client is a defendant(infringer),an
examination & investigation of the Form 3 filed in the
application will provide surprisingly effective grounds for
revocation of the patent itself. Hence, even though Form 3 ,at the
moment, is considered a mere formality, an application of one’s mind
on this aspect will prove highly
productive.
| |