|
FOREWORD
October
2004
Dear
Sirs/Friend,
Sub:
Patentmatics.com –
October 2004 Issue.
October is a month of great
significance for our country, being the ‘birth month’ of Mahatmaji.
When we remember him on the 2nd, we are also reminded of
the resonant words of his great disciple late Jawahar Lal Nehru
speaking soon after the assasination on January 31,1949 over the All
India Radio “The Light has gone out and there is darkness
everywhere. The Father of the Nation, Babu as we used to call him,
is no more…The Light has gone out, I said, and yet I was wrong….that
Light represented living Truth”( As exquisitely summarized by the
well-known historian Ramachandra Guha the other day, these two great
men would ever be remembered in our country, the former as the
chosen leader who led the nation to political independence and the
latter for his crucial role in laying the foundations of republican
democracy thereafter). Undoubtedly the nation continues to suffer
from the “miles to go” syndrome to inherit the proud heritage. On
the one hand it is not unusual that along with giving customary
tributes, many present day political/administrative leaders in
authority profess quoting Gandhiji in support of the ‘opening-up’
through the New Economic Policy! Its proponants highlight that
thanks to a one-and-half decade of the NEP, India’s gross national
income is now at at $3,068 billion and per capita income at $2,880
by purchasing power parity, ahead of Pakisthan, as summarised in the
recent World Bank Development Report; and in turn they champion
futher ‘liberalisation’,ignoring the fact that, as emphasised in the
latest EPW analysis, “A detailed re-examination of the NSS
consumption data for 1999-2000 shows that the poverty ratio fell at
most by 3% between 1993-94 and 1999-2000, and it likely that the
number of poor increased over this period”? In other words, even
though India is “shining”for many, with some like the Chief of WIPRO
entering into even the Forbes List of the Super-rich under the
liberalised economic-political regime, the inequality levels have
only gone up tremendously under the same
political-economic dispensation. In a similar manner and thanks to
the post-WTO-TRIPS political-administrative policy scenario, the
basic strenghts of the existing techno-industrial-agricultural base,
built assiduously during the past five decades, are under severe
creticism and steadily losing its ‘shine’ without a truly national
and ‘core-competent’ alternate in place. With fundamentalist
ideologies of differing hues and definitions spreading far and wide
and with FDI being essentially projected as the true succour for
future development, will the nation slowly and steadily slip into a
pseudo ‘banana republic’, to quote the senior economist Prabhat
Patnaik from one of his recent and very cogently articulated
lecture? The thoughts on the occasion of the 135th Birth
Day of the Father of the Nation are truly haunting.
“TODAY was another important
day for the Indian Space Research Organisation, as the GSLV-FO1
rocket took off into the skies as per plan and put its cargo, the
Edusat satellite, into the designated orbital slot. The 1,950-kg
Edusat is the heaviest satellite to be launched from India. The
rocket, which carried it marked a `hat-trick', being the third
successful GSLV launch in a row. At 4.01 pm on this damp afternoon,
the 49-metre, 414-tonne-heavy rocket thundered skyward from the
Satish Dhawan Space Centre, the launch base at the coastal town of
Sriharikota. Seventeen minutes after the lift-off, the Rs 160-crore
rocket completed its mission (and its life) by ejecting the Edusat
into its orbit”, so wrote the Hindu Business Line on September
20,2004, describing the great event. In
more than one way this is true. It is also the consummation of the
Founding Father Vikram Sarabhai’s “dream come true” – starting with
the SITE experiment by recource to a US based satellite in the early
seventies, he demonstrated the use of satellite television for
education and rural development. Through the nearly 2T EDUSAT
launched by GSLV from Satish Dhawan Space Centre, ISRO has truly
honoured its founder most appropriately.
Patentmatics joins the dedicated ISRO community in celebrating the
great achievement. It is in this context that we perhaps have to
critically analyse the implications, opportunities and challenges of
the recent developments in India-US relations with respect to the
strategic sectors.Perhaps the most crucial
S&T news item in the contemporary context of US-India relations is
that after talks between Foreign Secy Shyam Saran and US officials,
including Under-Secy of State Marc Grossman:
• US eases curbs on supply of
equipment and technology for India’s civilian space and nuclear
programmes
• ISRO removed from a prohibition
list, clearing a major obstacle in indo-us strategic ties.
• “The first phase (in the Next Steps
in Strategic Partnership or NSSP) is, of course, more fixed on the
space side. When we get into the second phase, it will be focused
perhaps a little more on the nuclear stage,’’ Saran said.
Further to the above, the United States
is reported to have now lifted some of the sanctions against Indian
space and nuclear entities, taking forward the Next Steps in
Strategic Partnership (NSSP) between the two countries. The US
Commerce Department's decision to lift sanctions against Indian
Space Research Organisation's (ISRO) subordinate entities and
Department of Atomic Energy entities would ease export of some
high-tech items to India. The Department also said that it had now
corrected some "mistakes" in an earlier announcement by the Bureau
of Industry and Security. It said for some items there was a case-
by-case review and for others a presumption of approval. The ISRO
subordinate entities are: ISRO Telemetry, Tracking and Command
Network; ISRO Inertial Systemsnit, Thiruvananthapuram; Liquid
Propulsion Systems Center; Solid Propellant Space Booster Plant;
Space Applications Center, Ahmedabad; Sriharikota Space Centre;
Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram. The US has also
lifted sanctions against DAE Entities like Bhabha Atomic Research
Centre; Indira Gandhi Atomic Research Centre; Indian Rare Earths;
Nuclear reactors (including power plants) not under International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards, fuel reprocessing and
enrichment facilities, heavy water production facilities and their
collocated ammonia plants. In other words, if these developments are
explicitly confirmed by official sources, one can see a material
change in US attitude towards her earlier ‘embargo’ policies towards
India for reasons known to herself. While on the one hand, these
changes could hopefully accelerate the national programs in the
immediate context, all efforts must be made to see that the imported
materials and systems are used only to give us a higher level of
“quick assisted take off”, to use the famous description of late
Homi Bhabha, and to sustain the S&T lead on equal terms with the
collaborator/import agencies through development of concurrent
IPR audited-and - protected indigenous R&D programs. A Faustian
Choice, which ISRO and DAE are certainly capable of.
According to a report from Business
Line, rise in Bt cottonseed distribution through both official and
unofficial channels is among the various reasons for the projected
increase in domestic cotton output for the 2004-05 season, now
poised to cross the record 200-lakh-bale mark, with at least 30 per
cent of the crop area under Bt cotton. In other words, the so-called
“Gene Revolution” is slowly spreading to our country as well, a
process which will steadily gather momentum when more of useful
GM seeds become available. In other words, again, the ongoing
agricultural policy must take into account not only the task of
‘defending the Green Revolution”, to use the description of Prof
Swaminathan, but also to face the GMP Problem sqarely to our
advantage, including the related IPR aspects of New Plant Varieties.
The October issue lists four articles on the subject : the WTO “July
Package” , two Business Line articles, the first one on
‘demystification’ of fertiliser/agricultural subsidies and the
second one “Farming in US & India – the Ground Reality on Subsidy”
elaborating the issue through details on the highly
capital-intensive US agriculture obviously to meet the shortage in
agricultural manpower and her efforts to keep the costs of
production of major items at their lowest and the Total Support
Elements provided by US government to protect her ‘agricultural
security’ (Total Support Estimate TSE to agriculture in OECD
countries is paced at $350 billion – EU $137bn, US $94bn and Japan
$56bn-), and the fourth on elisting the potential dangers in
treating Indian agricuture as a ‘Single Box’ commodity (as
invariably done by also India in WTO negotiations) from the point of
view of the nation and of the States and, essentially as another WTO-dictated
conditionality, the recent decision on the Union government for free
import of seeds in the new Import Policy. It is probably only
natural that among the many states , already worried of the
developments, a state like AP with a big stake in food- and nonfood
crops based agriculture has lready announced that it will formulate
its own Seeds Policy, with more perhaps to follow when the potential
dangers start seeping in ! Undoubtedly, the issues are far more
complex than what seems to be currently realised at the Union
government level from the points of view of IPRs and
trade-distorting and non-trade distorting support possibilities,
more so from the need for a ‘composite policy approach’
matching with the food security at national level and the crucial
agro-economic security requirements at States level. The claim
of the Union Minister that the latest WTO Round was a great victory
for India needs to be re-asessed with “patriotism, principles and
professionalism”, the three great qualities attributed by
I.G.Patel to the doyen agricultural economist-policy planner Prof
Samar Ranjan Sen of the yester years in his recent EPW article
(September 18,2004).
In continuation of “Total Factor
Productivity and Core Competence” of one major manufacturing
sector, namely the oil PSUs, the current issue deals with similar
aspects on another equally crucial one, though from the
infrastructure sector, namely telecom. The article on “Whither
Indian Telecom Sector” summarises the current situation whereas
“State Support for Industrial R&D in Developing Economies, Telecom
Equipment Industry in India and China” reproduced from EPW
highlights the major maladies of the Indian sector as contrasted
with the valuable lessons from the policy experiences of China.
Importantly enough, much remains to be learnt by us not only on
managing modern PSU industries but also on using ‘industrial
science’ – to use the description of late JN Tata – in effecting
steady technological progress. Whereas the article on “The Much
Maligned Public Sector – Mohan’s SAIL Model Revisited” deals with
the former, the one on “Economic Role of Science” by the doyen
economist-science policy researcher Nathan Rosenberg, written even
as early as the seventies, examines “Marx’s treatment of rising
resource productivity and technological change under capitalism.
Little attention has been given to Marx’s view of the role which
science plays in these processes. It is obvious that Marx (and
Engels) attach the greatest importance to the development of modern
science, but the way in which scientific progress meshes with the
rest of the Marxian system has not been fully understood. The paper
analyzes Marx’s treatment of the factors which account for the
growth of scientific knowledge as well as capitalist society’s
changing capacity to incorporate this knowledge into the productive
process”. Is it true that through the latest developments in the
Finish telecom industry, the predictions of Schumpeterian
Innovations have become a reality or is it only through a still
higher level of ‘labour saving’ innovations when ‘the capitalist
enlists science in its service’, to quote Marx from his Capital ?
Patentmatics hopes to continue this discussion in later issues also
as applied to different basic industries.
Contuining the analysis of the New
PCT Regime, the number of PCT applications on “anticancer drugs” -
many of which have India also is a destination – currently works out
to 38, the latest being “Monoclonal Antibody, Gene Encoding the
same, Hybridoma, Medicinal Composition & Diagnostic Reagent” WO
2004/ 076658 dated Feb 27,2004, in favour of Mitsubishi Pharma Corpn
et.al. The number of EMR (Exclusive Marketing Rights) Applications
in India at present is as listed below:
LIST OF EMR FILED IN INDIA
AND ITS STATUS – as on September 2004
|
S.no |
Applicant |
EMR applied for Drug Product |
Brand name |
Status |
|
1 |
Glaxosmithkline Beecham
|
Rosiglitazone (Novel Compound) |
Avandia |
EMR- Rejected |
|
2 |
Glaxosmithkline Beecham
|
Novel Compound- Name not known |
Not known |
EMR- Rejected |
|
3 |
Novartis |
Imatinib Mesylate |
Glivec |
EMR granted – the first time in
India |
|
4 |
Wockhardt |
Nadifloxacin |
Nadoxin |
EMR granted |
|
5 |
United Phosphorus |
Combination of Carbedazim &
Macozeb |
SAAF |
EMR granted (first EMR of an
Indian Company) |
|
6 |
Nicolas Piramal |
Aablaqine |
Bulaquine |
EMR application pending |
|
7 |
Hoffman-La-Roche |
Saquinavir mesylate |
Invirase |
EMR Rejected |
|
8 |
Eli-Lilly |
Tadalafil |
Cialis |
EMR granted but stayed |
|
9 |
Astra-Zenca |
Gefitinib |
Iressa |
EMR application pending |
|
10 |
Astra-Zenca |
Ximelagatran |
Exanta |
EMR application pending |
|
11 |
Wockhardt |
Pharma compositions contaning
Benzoquinolizines |
Not known |
EMR application pending |
|
12 |
Schering plough |
Biotech- interferon alpha |
Not known |
EMR application pending
|
|
13 |
Bristol Myers Squibb |
Gatefloxacin |
Tequin |
EMR application pending |
|
14 |
Bayer |
Moxifloxacin |
Avelox |
EMR application pending |
|
15 |
Novartis |
Zoledronic acid |
Zometa |
EMR application pending |
|
16 |
Ranbaxy |
Once- a-day oral controlled release
form (name of the drug product not available) |
Ciprofloxacin |
EMR application pending |
|
17 |
Eli Lilly |
Tetracyclic derivatives, process for
preparation and use thereof |
Not known |
EMR application pending |
The article by NS Subbaram summarizes
elegantly the varying aspects of the Indian EMR Act . With the
Glivec case still awaiting for the final decision of Supreme Court
(almost an year has already passed since the judicial procedures
were started), the arguments of the Justice Rajagopal Ayyangar
Committee in championing the cause of “Licenses of Rights” after
three years for drugs will continue to haunt the conscience of the
nation under the New IPR Regime, till the relevant constututional
authority orders that judiciary must deliver its judgements within a
stipulated time schedule on at least life-saving drugs!
Last but not least, patentmatics pays
its homage to the memories of the doyen nuclear scientist late Dr
Raja Ramanna by republishing an obituary written by his
distinguished colleague Dr P K Iyengar in The Hindu and of the
Amul’s Tech Wizard late Shri Dalya through an article from Hindu
Business Line. Though Ramanna was often described as the Father of
Indian Nuclear Bomb, he was also, unlike others of similar
description, the same person who was instrumental to formulate the
“Not The First One To Use” Policy for India, a unique person with a
unique deterrent doctrine indeed. A multiple personnage of very
great distinction, he will always be remembered in the annals of our
modern age. So also late Shri Dalya for his pioneering role for
ushering in the White Revolution in our country by the trio – late
Shri Tribhuvandas Patel described often as the Father, Dr Varghese
Kurien the Son, Dalya himself as the Holy Ghost of the proverbial
saga, which in turn has made India the second largest producer of
milk (even the first now?) and concurrently also ensuring an
equitable share for the millions of farmers spread all over the
villages. Astounding contribution for a nation crying for such
‘appropriate’ development strategies in her onward march to better
prosperity with also equity and human dugnity. May their souls rest
in peace!
Finally, being
a purely educational and voluntary non-profitable activity,
patentmatics has been reproducing a number of relevant articles
under the ‘fair use’ doctrine. It is hoped once again that the
authors and publishers will aptly condone the IPR issues if any!
Yours sincerely,
A D Damodaran.
NOTE :
Kindly note that without much delay,
www.patentmatics.com will
be
www.patentmatics.org
A D Damodaran.
|